Reevaluation of Self-Expanding Metal Stents as a Bridge to Surgery for Acute Left-Sided Malignant Colonic Obstruction: Six Years Experience
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery have been used as an alternative for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. However, the benefits are uncertain. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy no longer recommends their use in patients with low surgical risk because of the risk of tumor recurrence. METHODS Patients admitted for acute malignant left-sided colonic obstruction who underwent SEMS as a bridge to elective surgery or urgent surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Postoperative morbidity/mortality, stent complications and survival were recorded. Our aim was to compare the outcome between preoperative SEMS and direct emergent surgery in acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. RESULTS 42 patients were included (SEMS group: 27 and surgery group: 15). There were no differences between groups in relation to age, ASA classification and tumor stage. The technical success of SEMS was 88.9% and the clinical success was 85.2%. There were three SEMS related perforations. In the surgery group, the stoma rate was higher (86.7% vs 25.9%, p < 0.001) and there was a trend for a lower length of hospital stay (18.9 days vs 26.3 days, p = 0.051). SEMS verses surgery group: There were no differences in the rate of temporary stoma (57.1% vs 61.5%, p = 0.84), definitive stoma (42.8% vs 38.5%, p = 0.84), success of primary anastomosis (86.7% vs 66.7%, p = 0.22) and Clavien-Dindo classification (≥III: 36% vs 58.2% p = 0.24). Overall survival at 1/5 years was identical in the two groups 100%/56% in the SEMS group vs 93%/43% in the surgery group, p = 0.14), as well as tumor recurrence at 3/5 years (24%/50% vs 20%/36% respectively, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS SEMS are associated with a lower overall stoma rate and a higher primary anastomosis rate. However, there are no differences in complications, overall survival and recurrence between the groups.
منابع مشابه
Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To compare self-expanding metal stents with emergency open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial. SETTING An acute care hospital. PATIENTS Adult patients with an obstructing tumor between the splenic flexure and rectosigmoid junction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Successful 1-stage operation, cumulative operative time, b...
متن کاملThe Safety and Efficiency of Surgery with Colonic Stents in Left-Sided Malignant Colonic Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
Objective. This meta-analysis is aimed at assessing the safety and efficiency of colonic self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) used as a bridge to surgery in the management of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction (LMCO). Methods. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, OVID, Google Scholar, CNKI, and WANGFANG for relevant randomized trials comparing colonic stenting u...
متن کاملMinimally invasive treatment of low rectal cancer: stenting as a bridge to surgery
Stenting as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) is a relatively novel procedure, potentially useful to treat symptomatic left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. The clinical use of SBTS has been mainly suggested in advanced or non resectable tumors, in order to avoid the need for emergency surgery, thus obtaining a good palliation and, at the same time, delaying the elective major procedure. SBTS migh...
متن کاملExpandable metal stents for malignant colorectal strictures.
The surgical management of malignant colorectal obstruction is still controversial and has higher associated mortality and complication rates compared with elective surgery. Placement of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) has been proposed as an alternative therapeutic approach for colonic decompression of patients with acute malignant obstruction. SEMS placement may be used both as a bridge...
متن کاملEndoscopic Stenting as Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Resection for Left-Sided Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: An Updated Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION Emergency resection represents the traditional treatment for left-sided malignant obstruction. However, the placement of self-expanding metallic stents and delayed surgery has been proposed as an alternative approach. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to review the available evidence, with particular interest for the short-term outcomes, including a recent multicentre RCT. ...
متن کامل